The story goes that two old boys named Luke and Ray-Bob had themselves a truck and were buying watermelons in Fla. and Ga. for $2 and trucking them to Chicago and Detroit and selling them for $2. After awhile, they noticed that they were not making any money; naturally enough, they had a big business meeting and came to the conclusion that they needed a bigger truck.
Evolutionists, of course, are using time in precisely the same manner in which the two rednecks are using truck size, and there is no real reason for anybody to take them any more seriously than they would take the two rednecks.
Now, You couldn't easily prove that Luke and Ray-Bob couldn't possibly make money buying and selling for $2 since they could always say they merely needed the next size bigger truck. There is one thing which would really demolish their case however: that, God forbid, would be for somebody like Algor to get elected president and immediately outlaw the internal combustion engine; after THAT, guaranteed, nobody would ever make money trucking watermelons from Florida to Chicago and selling them for what they paid for them.
Likewise, If comebody could provide a coercive case for the fact that American Indians dealt with dinosaurs on a regular basis, then the time-frames which evolutionists so love to use as a magic wand to enable their doctrines would be demolished, the entire doctrine of evolutionism, broken. Not that there is any lack of logical proofs that no amount of time would suffice for macro-evolution but, without those time scales, no version of evolution is even thinkable, much less possible.
In this regard, evolutionists and geologists would appear to have developed a sort of a dinosaur-in-the-livingroom problem over the last few years. Take the case of Mishipishu, the "Water panther" for instance.
Petroglyphs show him with the dorsal blades of the stegosaur and Indian legends speak of him using his "great spiked tail" as a weapon. Remarkably, the Canadian national parks which maintain these pictographs are unaware of the notion of interpreting Mishipishu as a stegosaur, and refer to him only as a "manatou", or water spirit.
Vine Deloria is probably the best known native American author of the last half century or so. He is a past president of the National Council of American Indians, and several of his books, including the familiar "Custer Died for Your Sins", are standard university texts on Indian affairs.
One of Vine's books, "Red Earth, White Lies", is a book about catastrophism and about the great North American megaufauna extinctions which occurred around 12000 years ago (using conventional dating). In this book, Vine utterly destroys the standard "overkill" and "blitzkrieg" hypotheses which are used to explain these die-outs.
Vine informs me that "Red Earth, White Lies" is one of several books which arise from decades of research including conversations with nearly every story-teller and keeper of oral traditions from Alaska down to Central and South America. He tells me that, if there was one thing which used to completely floor him early on in this research, it was the extent to which most of these tribes retain oral traditions of Indians having to deal not only with pleistocene megafauna, but with dinosaurs as well. In "Red Earth, White Lies", he notes (pages 242-243) that:
Indians generfly speak with a precise and literal imagery. As a rule, when trying to identify creatures of the old stories, they say they are "like" familiar neighborhood animals, but then carefully differentiate the perceived differences. I have found that if the animal being described was in any way comparable to modern animals, that similarity would be pointed out; the word "monster" would not be used.
Only in instances where the creature bears no resemblance to anything we know today will it be described as a monster. Since no dinosaur shape resembles any modern animal, and since the reports are to be given literal credibility I must suggest that we are identifying a dinosaur. Thus, in the story of large animals at Pomme de Terre prairie in southwestern Missouri, a variant of the story suggests that the western animals were megafauna and the creatures who crossed the Mississippi and Missouri Rivers and invaded the lands of the megafauna were dinosaurs. The dinosaurs thus easily displace the familiar, perhaps Pleistocene, megafauna and move west, where we find their remains in the Rocky Mountains today
In numerous places in the Great Lakes are found pictographs of a creature who has been described in the English translation as the "water panther" This animal has a saw-toothed back and a benign, catlike face in many of the carvings. Various deeds are attributed to this panther, and it seems likely that the pictographs of this creature which are frequently carved near streams and lakes are a warning to others that a water panther inhabits that body of water. The Sioux have a tale about such a monster in the Missouri River. According to reports, the monster had ". . . red hair all over its body . . . and its body was shaped like that of a buffalo. It had one eye and in the middle of its forehead was one horn. Its backbone was just like a cross- cut saw; it was flat and notched like a saw or cogwheel" I suspect that the dinosaur in question here must be a stegosaurus.
Then there is the case of the Brontosaur Pictograph on rough stone.
This petroglyph, in fact, first came to light with the Doheney Expedition to Java Supai, the report of which comes not from the National Enquirer, but from the Peabody Muscum of American Ethnology at Harvard University.
Then there is the case of the man and brontosaur petroglyph at the Natural Bridges National Monument in Utah:
A book on Indian rock art sold atthe park visitors center notes:
"There is a petroglyph in Natural Bridges National Monument that bears a startling resemblance to dinosaur, specifically a Brontosaurus, with a long tail and neck, small head and all." (Prehistoric Indians, Barnes and Pendleton, 1995, p.201) The desert varnish, which indicates age, is especially heavy over this section.
Then again, there is the picture which the people at Bible.ca snapped of Don Patten with the petroglyph of the triceroptops:
And the pterodactyle at San Rafael Swell in Black Dragon Wash, Utah:
Like I say, it's never been easy to be an evolutionist, and it's not getting any easier. For the truth about evolutionism, check out one or more of:
1. Michael Denton's "Evolution, a Theory in Crisis", available in major book outlets.
2. Phillip Johnson's "Darwin on Trial", also available in major outlets. Does evolution in its current forms meet the defining criteria of a pseudoscience? Would any of the arguments made by evolutionists meet the ordinary standards of validity or logic required in an American courtroom? Who better than the distinguished legal scholar to answer such questions.
3. Alexander Mebane's "Darwin's Creation Myth", available from:
The SourceBook Project P.O. Box 107 Glen Arm, Md. 21057
If I had to pick one such book for most readers, this would be it. Alexander Mebane, of the Tampa Bay Skeptics has put together a big-picture view of everything which has come unraveled with the theory of evolution (all versions) and presents it like a very good executive summary with just enough technical detail to allow a complete understanding of the issues involved.
4. Walter ReMine's "The Biotic Message", available for $44.95 from:
St. Paul Science PO Box 19600 St. Paul, Mn 55119
The relation of population genetics to evolution is covered amongst other topics, and the notion of "message theory" is developed as a rational interpretation of the evidence available in the fossil record, while evolution is shown not to be a rational interpretation.
5. Michael Behe's "Darwin's Black Box", available in major outlets, describes the insurmountable problems which the last 50 years of research in molecular biology have presented for evolutionism. Behe's book makes the case that innumerable systems within the living cell are irreducibly complex, and could not possibly or plausibly arise in any sort of a random or haphazard manner as evolutionists insist.
6. Wendell Birds two-volume Origin of Species Revisited, Philosophical Library of New York. Evolutionists will be quick to claim that some of the other authors and/or the organizations publishing their works are fundamentalists or Jesus-freaks of one stripe or other; no such claim could conceivably be made about the Philosophical Society/Library of New York.
7. Jonathan Wells' "Icons of Evolution", which describes the manner in which evolutionists' bogus pet fossil interpretations remain entrenched in textbooks long after they have been thoroughly discredited.
And, last, but not least, check out the section on evolutionism at Bearfabrique. Just click on the image of Chuck Darwin morphing into an ape.