This page last updated:
Books now available on Bearfabrique
Several books are now available for sale either as print on demand books or ebook downloads on the product section of bearfabrique. This includes a little book about gravity and dinosaurs, as well as two very large books dealing with Immanuel Velikovsky and the controversy surrounding his works over the last 55 years. Taken together, those two items amount to around 1260 pages in the form of two five-dollar downloads in pdf format, i.e. less expensive than communist literature used to be in the CCCP.
Immanuel Velikovsky, Founder of Modern Catastrophist Science.
Current Main Page for Catastrophism
Senator Smithfield faced the crowd
and scanned the sky, without a cloud
when suddenly, with swiftness frightning,
he was struck by a bolt of lightning!!!"
Smithfield would have told you that there was too much static electricity floating around in 1957, but for sure he would have not enjoyed living in ancient times; there was a lot MORE of it floating around back then.
That's a strange-sounding claim, but it is backed up by massive scholarship. Al DeGrazia maintains a WWW site from which, for the cost of production ($10), you might order a copy of what he terms a Quantavolution CDROM which contains 23 published works in Adobe PDF format along with a copy of the Adobe reader, and has kindly given me permission to include three of those works on this site. They support the notion of more static electricity in ancient times, and you may view or download them at your discretion.
Crossthwaite/DeGrazia references.
These works are in Adobe PDF format. They require that, if you have not done so already, you get over to www.adobe.com and download the free Adobe Acrobat reader. The Adobe pdf system is a computer typesetting system; the materials come up on screen as you would see them on the pages of a professionally formatted publication.
The more powerful electrostatic and electromagnetic nature of the Earth in ancient times was occasioned by and itself was the cause of a number of phenomena which divide the ancient world and our world into fundamentally different kinds of realities, resulting in the present FUBAR state of virtually every branch of science which attempts to make sense out of prehistoric conditions. A proper understanding of ancient realities, particularly as they are effected by the electrostatic nature of our planet in the recent past, will provide a rational view of our own history and our own nature, and a rational understanding of a large number of phenomena which, viewed from the confines of current paradigms, appear merely as an increasingly large collection of anomalies.
As Plato and others note, the ancients recognized a spiritual God much as we do, but they also recognized the various planetary gods, and all of their religions and ceremonies were basically astral in nature. The associations of the names of those gods and of the planets are, in fact, primordial. The problem is this: If a group of primitive people were to attempt to establish an astral religion today, the two things which they would unerringly end up worshipping as chieftain gods would be the sun and the moon. The two chieftain gods in all ancient religions, however, were those whose names were associated with the planets Jupiter and Saturn.
It turns out to be an easy demonstration that nothing larger than the largest elephants could live in our present world due to the nature of gravity.
The reasons why elephants don't gallop today are obvious enough and well known. Nonetheless, prehistoric art clearly depicts mammoths stretched out in full gallop.
Albatrosses, at just over 30 lbs, can barely take off and land in our world and are our largest flying birds. Gravity does not allow for 200-lb. eagles with 25' wingspans in our present world; it did in prehistoric times.
The
The questions of the former supercontinent and the curious sea (Tethys) which intruded upon it involve further anomalies which are explained by the Saturn thesis and by the attractive forces, gravitational and electromatnetic, of the cosmic alignment described in the Kronia WWW site.
If you assume that the largest elephants are the largest animals possible in our present world, and if you accept McGowan's 180 ton figure for the ultrasaur and equate the two, i.e. if you assume that the sauropod could have "felt" no heavier than the largest elephant feels now at 7 or 8 tons, then you get a factor of about 2.7 to one between the acceleration due to gravity in our world and in the ultrasaur's world. Even accepting the lightest figures ever published for ultrasaurs, supersaurs, seismosaurs etc., you would still get a required attenuation of gravity too great to be accounted for by any possible cosmic alignment, interaction with other bodies, or accumulation of mass on our planet between then and now. The only possibility remaining, is that there is something fundamentally wrong with our basic understanding of gravity. That in fact turns out to be the case, as Ralph Sansbury describes.
Sansbury's Book
For those who like their physics hard and raw.
A Plain-Language Description of the Sansbury Experiment.
The Idiot's Version (for guys like me...)
Have floods of a global nature occurred within the memory of man, and is there reason to believe that the causes of one or more of these were extraterrestrial (i.e. caused by interaction with other cosmic bodies or materials in space which our planet might have encountered)?
Views of the Main Pyramid The main pyramid in the hexagonal ring of pyramids at Cydonia from last April's GPS strip images.
Julian Jaynes, the Tower of Babel, and the Nature of Antedeluvian Language
This one is not the familiar claim of cryptic messages or prophecy in the Bible. Rather, it is a claim, apparently well-documented, that the bible itself is simply written in a manner which would be beyond the mental capacity of modern man to duplicate. The claim is that similar words and phrases and phrases with similar meanings are represented by entirely similar numeric representations when you view the Hebrew letters of which they are comprised as numbers (which they also represented in the same manner in which the familiar Roman numeral system works). The claim is that God produced the bible since man could not. Another possibility would be that some sort of a planetary mind existed in antediluvian times, enabled by the sort of collective consciousness which prevailed then, and that things like bible codes might be the work of such a planetary mind.
The theory of evolution, at this point in time, has been massively discredited. You can check out my own pages on the topic, the pages linked from them, the various scholarly treatises referenced or simply do searches on the WWW starting with the word "evolution". Contrary to what you might expect, given that evolution is still the official position of the NEA and the public school monopoly as well as of most university biology departments, you will find reasoned argument and logic on the side of the anti-evolutionists, ad-hominem and desparation on that of the evolutionists.
Nonetheless, change DID occur in biological forms in past ages, and the overwhelming evidence is that, when it did occur, it occurred very rapidly. New kinds of creatures always appear in the fossil record with no antecedants or evolutionary trail of any sort and there is no reason, based on evidence, to ever assume that any of those changes took more than one or two generations. That basically says bio-engineering, and not evolution. This is another evidence of a former planetary intellect; the intelligence needed to do that sort of thing may have arisen from the pooling of intellectual powers.
Gunnar Heinsohn, one of Europe's leading scholars, notes that there is no reason based upon evidence to assume that the change from neanderthal to modern man took more than one or two generations and, as noted above, you have to regard such a change as evidence of bio-engineering or re-engineering rather than as evidence of any sort of a long sequence of events driven by stochastic processes and guided by "natural selection", which is what we call evolution.
While neanderthals may have appeared reasonably similar to us, scientists had long been puzzled by the total lack of any evidence of crossbreeding and, finally, two summers ago, they found out why. DNA samples extracted from neanderthal teeth indicated that their DNA was "about halfway between ours and that of a chimpanzee".
It's fairly obvious why evolutionists don't like to talk about this one; that leaves the planet without anything resembling a plausible evolutionary antecedent for modern man. The most obvious solution would be to say that there must have been some hominid intermediary between the neanderthal and modern man. Such a creature moreover, in overwhelming likelihood, would have to stand closer to us in time than the neanderthal and, since we find neanderthal remains and works all over the place, would have to have left plentiful evidence. Nonetheless, there is no evidence of such a thing on the planet; all other hominid remains are further removed from us THAN the neanderthal.
This leaves the evolutionists with one possible fallback position, i.e. to
claim that the neanderthal is a cousin and not an ancestor, and that modern man
AND the neanderthal arose from some common or similar ancestors, at about the
same time. This presents a worse problem than before: the evolutionist then has
to explain how the neanderthal held
Again, the only really plausible solution, given the facts, lies in some form of bio-engineering. Either some sort of a planetary mind or the creatures themselves, pooling their intelligence, managed to change their morphology within one or two generations.
Given standard theories wrt the history of our solar system and our own
planet, nobody should be finding cities and villages on Mars, 2100 feet beneath
the waves off
Those interested in the city off
This page has been visited:
times since the afternoon of